Actually this is exactly what is happening light has mass and so it has weight,
the
MC on the lens stops bad light from passing through the lens now this is the
paradox
by making the lens light-less they have made it liter!! If you don't believe me
put
the lens caps on to trap the light inside and then weigh it and see if it
doesn't
weigh more!!
Terry
Hans van Veluwen wrote:
> At the moment people started to take Kelton's funmail seriously I just *had*
> to weigh my SC E.Zuiko 135mm/F2.8 and my MC Zuiko 135mm/F2.8, and the
> results are shocking! The SC lens weighs 367 gram, the MC version weighs 351
> gram... Mind you, same lens! The only other difference besides coating is
> that the MC lens still has its 'passed' sticker and the SC lens does not, so
> the difference would even be bigger! Now before you start thinking of new
> theories that maybe the photones passing the multi coated layers don't loose
> as much energy as those passing the single coated layers, and thus make the
> lens lighter, let me tell you that the really shocking fact is that this
> lens is supposed to weigh, according to Olympus, printed both in the '79
> p-SIF and in the '85 Lens Handbook: 360 gram! So what's happening here? Is
> this the beginning of Yet Another Conspiracy Theory? Is the number of
> elements that Olympus puts in its lenses subject to a randomizer, or maybe
> based on the value of the Yen? Is there a grey market for stolen lens
> elements? Are there actuallly 350mm/F2.8 lenses that have only *one* element
> so that you can easily carry them in your inner pocket? Yes brothers and
> sisters Zuiks, this calls for a deep investigation!
>
> Hanz Holmez
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|