Subject: | Re: [OM] Beattie Intenscreen and Bogen Comments (and Zuikoholism).... |
---|---|
From: | "Terry and Tracey" <foxcroft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 14 May 1998 22:53:27 +1000 |
>I only owned the 100-200/5 Zuiko zoom. Some may like it, but I thought it >was really substandard for Olympus. It's the lens equivelent to pond water. > >Ken N. But it was a S Zuiko. Like the 35-70mm F4, and the new zooms with the 2000 (52 mm filters), they are intended for the "consumer" market. So the US Oly rep mailed me. Foxy < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] Slides on the cheap - a beginners guide, Joel Wilcox |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-4T Multi-Spot Metering, John A. Prosper |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Beattie Intenscreen and Bogen Comments (and Zuikoholism)...., Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Beattie Intenscreen and Bogen Comments (and Zuikoholism)...., Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |