Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Beattie Intenscreen and Bogen Comments (and Zuikoholism)....

Subject: Re: [OM] Beattie Intenscreen and Bogen Comments (and Zuikoholism)....
From: gma <gma@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 20:31:11 -0700
Thanks for that info, CH.  I think I've decided that I'm leaning towards
waiting til I can afford the 35-80 F/2.8 before adding a zoom to my collection.

george


C.H.Ling wrote:

> I have both 100/2 and 35-105/3.5-4.5, I retrieve my old test shot for both
> lenses. I found the zoom at 105/4.5 is very close or may be better than the
> 100 at f2 but at f4 I found the 100/2 is better.
>
> There are some other factors that make me paid more for the 100/2, the
> distortion of the zoom at 105 is 1.37%, too high for me. Also the F4.5
> aperture is too small, I like to use the 100 at f2.8 for portrait.
>
>
> > Richard
> >
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz