Re: [OM] OM-2S Meter Question

[gma]

John A. Prosper wrote:
> 
>/4.5
> |just ain't making the weight cut even the 65-200 is a bit much!  ( Maybe
> |this new light-weight zoom they're selling with the 2000??)
> 
> Sounds like Gary's idea of using a 200/5 is the way for you
> to go if you can find one used.  It's as short and about as
> light as a standard lens but is a true 200mm tele.

-- 
Is the 200 F/5 a Zuiko? Haven't heard of it. I'll check my lens brochure
tonite.


george  :>)

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >