PCA Cala wrote:
>
>> My Sekonic is 450 grams (and 180 mm long) with case. The 200 mm f/5.0 Zuiko
> is 380 grams (and 105 mm long - almost a 0.5:1 telephoto ratio!). Considering
> I already carry an OM body when I shoot the 4x5, I'd be sheading 70 grams,
> plus 510 grames for the 200 mm f/4.0 I often carry in the 4x5's aluminum case.
> I'm starting to like this idea. Maybe someone this Sunday (at the Buena Park,
> CA camera show) will have a OM-4 and a 200 mm f/5.0 to swap for the Sekonic?
>
> Anyone have ANY lens test data on the f/5.0 ??? It was discontinued soon, so
> it might be sub-par optically.
>
> I saw lots of sub-$100US 200 mm f/5.0's at Terry and Gerri's Photography in
> Tavares, FL, but can't get them on the phone. They were going to sell out.
> Hope it isn't so.
>
> Gary Reese
> Las Vegas, NV
>
--
This IS sounding interesting. It would have to bea sharp lens though.
No sense carrying it otherwise, I think.
george :>)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|