Richard Schätzl wrote:
snip...
> But I found an test of the 14mm Sigma in an german magazin (foMag 1/91):
I forget, there was a ranking of another magazin (based on a Test in
CoFo 4/96):
Lens Points Rating
Leica Super-Elmar-R 3,5 15mm 67,1 Good
Nikon Nikkor 3,5 15mm 64,4 Good
Pentax-A 3,5 15mm 60,1 Acceptable
Nikon Nikkor 5,6 13mm 58,8 Acceptable
Canon EF 2,8 14mm L USM 57,0 Acceptable
Sigma 3,5 14mm 54,8 Acceptable
Max. points = 100
This rating migth be biased (towards Nikon, Leica), in the same table
is a rating of macro lenses which gaves the Micro Nikkor a better rating
than the 90mm Macro Zuiko, there own test (CoFo 1/88) showed that the
Zuiko is much better than the Nikkor on par with the Zeiss. The Nikkor
was worse the the Tokina AT-X or Pentax-F macro lens, definitly the
weekest lens.
So much to lens tests...
Richard
############################################################
| This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
| To receive the Digest version mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| with "subscribe olympus-digest" in the message body.
| To unsubscribe from the current list mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| with "unsubscribe olympus" in the body.
| For questions mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html
############################################################
|