Subject: | Re: [OM] Sigma 14/3.5? |
---|---|
From: | PCA Cala <PCACala@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 12 Mar 1998 10:44:47 EST |
Hi John: << Was the test unspectacular for lenses in general or only for14mm-class lenses. >> You will have to review the Subjective Quality Factor methodology that Popular Photography uses. It is my understanding that a panel judges a set of enlargements made with the lens being tested. Gary Reese Las Vegas, NV ############################################################ | This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List | To receive the Digest version mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | with "subscribe olympus-digest" in the message body. | To unsubscribe from the current list mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | with "unsubscribe olympus" in the body. | For questions mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html ############################################################ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-2000 & 35-70 test in Pop Photo, John A. Prosper |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Digital insert, VELUWEH |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Sigma 14/3.5?, John A. Prosper |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Sigma 14/3.5?, Doug Nowlin |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |