Gary Schloss wrote earlier:
>
>Unless your lens also has "MC" inscribed on its rim (unlikely!),
>it's single-coated. IMHO, this should be of little concern or
>deterrent to you, especially re: this particular lens which, in my
>experience, is phenomenally good.
Gary Schloss also wrote:
>To the MC issue: Per, you may be disappoined -- your lens is not MC.
>My own 300/f4.5 is serial #1113xx, and it's still SC.
>
Hmm, mine is serial 1106xx and, as you say, it is phenomenal. I was
absolutely sure it was a MC-version (has purple tint, can't really say about
the green) because of it's performance (fantastic in backlit situations,
sunset with sun in frame etc). But why are all MC 300's marked MC, as this
does not apply to other Zuikos? Is a brand-new 300/4.5 marked MC?
Ulf Westerberg
############################################################
| This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
| To receive the Digest version mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| with "subscribe olympus-digest" in the message body.
| To unsubscribe from the current list mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| with "unsubscribe olympus" in the body.
| For questions mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html
############################################################
|