Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Le Plus Que Ca Change . . . [was Random Sonyish Thoughts]

Subject: [OM] Le Plus Que Ca Change . . . [was Random Sonyish Thoughts]
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 20:48:08 -0800
On 2/3/2025 3:43 PM, usher99--- via olympus wrote:
No argument with  70-200/4 for travel --remarkable goes to 0.5 mag at all FL's, 
nice and sharp and good bokeh.

My favorite all round lens for OM, oh, so long ago, was a Kiron

                    Sony     Kiron
Focal Range        70-200    28-210
Aperture              f4     f4-5.6
Weight g             794      795
Diameter mm           82       75
Length               149      134
Filter thread         72       72
Max mag.              0.5     0.25
Appearance           Macho    Muted
Firmware digital
distortion correction  Yes      No

The 20-70/4 is a weird lens but is versatile and small.

See above

Not sure I like the linear distortion with resultant softish corners at the 
wide end

See above

but hey, all lenses are compromises.  It doesn't have the pizazz or coolness 
factor but if you want a very useful quite wide nl, AF lens for travel, why not.

So, all we've gained for all those decades is AF shorter zoom range and white 
finish?
Well, that was fun! 🙂

In all fairness, I had the Sony FE 24-240/3.5-6.3 for a while. Nice enough lens, but I couldn't see why I would tote another camera body, battery, charger, etc., when the Oly is as good or better over the Sony's range, lighter and smaller. The Sony found another home.

                    Sony     Kiron Sony        Oly
Focal Range FF     70-200    28-210    24-240     24-400
Aperture              f4     f4-5.6    f3.5-6.3 f3.5-6.3
Weight g             794      795       780        455
Diameter mm           82       75        81        78
Length               149      134       119        100
Filter thread         72       72        72        72
Max mag.              0.5     0.25      0.27      0.46
Appearance           Macho    Muted     Muted Muted


  I have primes like the Loxia 25 and CV 40/1.2 that either have micro contrast in spades or 
character, but only good for landscape or nothing moving fast.  I sometimes use the C/Y 35-70 
due to the micro-contrast and that it remarkably out-resolves the sensor at most FL's but am tiring 
of the hassle. AF at present is relegated to MFT.  The CV 90/3.5 and 180/4 are tiny  (OM 
mount) and adapt well on Sonnie.
Not sure I like the big boy either  compared to the svelte MFT options.

See above. 😉

A foot in 3 camps, Mike  (OM, MFT, Sonnie)

I did use the A7C a couple of days ago, for the first time in a month, with 
1956 design Canon 50/1.2 LTM.

Comparative Moose

--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz