Subject: | Re: [OM] How does it look? |
---|---|
From: | usher99--- via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 4 Feb 2024 22:42:23 +0000 (UTC) |
Cc: | "usher99@xxxxxxx" <usher99@xxxxxxx> |
WS writes:<<Using the filter for softening softens uniformly. Whereas spherical aberration <<varies with focal point, as bokeh does. Yes, I think you are spot on in that observation. Alt.Moose has that very cool Minolta Varisoft lens that has controllable spherical aberration.Curiously the cornea has net positive spherical aberration, (peripheral photons focus in front of main focal point) but the post-processing engine (occipital lobe) takes care of it. Curiously if one adds more pos SA say in an IOL (Intraocular lens for cataracts) there is no discernible loss of visual acuity (to a point) and the depth of field is extended. As there is no free lunch in optics the cost is loss of contrast sensitivity especially at higher spatial frequencies especially apparent when photons are scarce.Not too fuzzy, Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Fw: New version of Focus Magic--6.1, usher99--- via olympus |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] How does it look?, Moose |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] How does it look?, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] How does it look?, Wayne Harridge |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |