Subject: | Re: [OM] OM-2S Program vs OM-2 spot/program |
---|---|
From: | MICHAEL GORDON via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 13 Mar 2023 21:56:21 -0400 |
Cc: | MICHAEL GORDON <usher99@xxxxxxx> |
<<If the user gets interested in TTL flash, <<the 2n is better. Please elaborate. Did not the plain 2 fill in with ambient if the flash was insufficient? I think the 2n could be forced to do that. Both protocols have their advantages. Student of Dr. Flash, Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] More pix from Cute Gear - New Link, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-2S Program vs OM-2 spot/program, Moose |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-2S Program vs OM-2 spot/program, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-2S Program vs OM-2 spot/program, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |