I think if you set f stop so your auto shutter speed is 1/30, and fire on ttl
flash, you get one stop of fill from the flash (raising shutter speed to 1/60).
Each smaller f stop will give that much more fill from flash. 2/2N will both
do this (I think). Regarding the 2S: another difference in some 2S, is that
some bodies have a top cover with a "raised" pentaprism hump. When a circuit
was replaced by Olympus USA, a modified replacement top was installed, with a
prism hump extended by 0.5mm. This was to prevent cracking of the main circuit
IC(s) as the top was pressed down. Old top side wall = 1mm, new top =1.5mm.
Sent using https://www.zoho.com/mail/
---- On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 21:56:21 -0400 MICHAEL GORDON via olympus
<olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote ---
<<If the user gets interested in TTL flash, <<the 2n is better.
Please elaborate. Did not the plain 2 fill in with ambient if the flash was
insufficient? I think the 2n could be forced to do that. Both protocols have
their advantages.
Student of Dr. Flash, Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|