Fantastic, fine, fast, fun from Fuzzy Moose. I like it!
-----Original Message-----
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tue, Dec 14, 2021 2:24 am
Subject: Re: [OM] (Fwd) Re: [cml-glass] Advice on lens sets
On 12/12/2021 2:46 AM, Wayne Harridge wrote:
> Re. Canon FD, these seem to be underpriced compared to Olympus, Nikon, etc.
> I have recently purchased Canon FD 100mm f4 macro and Canon FD 200mm f4 macro
> (both UGly from KEH !) and both of these are very impressive on both m4/3 and
> Sony alpha.
I suspect the mount and adapters put people off. I had a bit of head scratching
about how to mount the adapter so the
aperture ring works. My FD mount lens is for a different purpose. It's the
85/2.8 Soft Focus. Sure, it's a fine portrait
length lens at setting 0, but I'm more interested in the soft settings.
Christmas tree lights I <https://photos.app.goo.gl/cNmYGVGkwormh5vY7>
Christmas tree lights I <https://photos.app.goo.gl/x1q1DvXK2C5fus3Q7>I
<https://photos.app.goo.gl/x1q1DvXK2C5fus3Q7>
I also have a couple of FL mount Canons. Chosen as well for their optical
"failings". Fast lens designs from the early
'60s that have interesting rendering at large apertures. 58/1.2 and 135/2.5.
The 135 mm hasn't had a proper workout as yet.
Fuzzy Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|