ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Cau

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Cau

from C.H.Ling

Subject:	Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic.
From:	"C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 18 May 2021 01:01:21 +0800



On 21/05/17 17:23, C.H.Ling wrote:

On 21/05/17 13:25, Moose wrote:
I think this will show that your application of Raw Therapee is farbehind Topaz.<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Process/TopazvsRawTherapee/TopazNR.htm>

Sorry, I misread your post, you have it Denoise then Sharpen. (I can'tget the same result with Sharpen AI only).

I tried another RawTherapee setting and then do Sharpen AI. It getcloser to your result now :-)


RawTherapee NR
http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/Topaz-Labs-Amsterdam-OriginalT-2.jpg

+Sharpen AI
http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/Topaz-Labs-Amsterdam-OriginalT-2-SAI-focus-noisy-10-30.jpg

C.H.Ling - Trying hard to avoid the purchase of Denoise AI :-)
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., (continued) Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., Mike Gordon via olympus Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., Piers Hemy Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., DZDub Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., DZDub Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) Now Topaz AI, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., Moose Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., C.H.Ling <= [OM] Alternative(s) to D-G nifty fifties [was Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic.], Moose

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., C.H.Ling
Next by Date:	[OM] E-WA trip, Mike Lazzari
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., C.H.Ling
Next by Thread:	[OM] Alternative(s) to D-G nifty fifties [was Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic.], Moose
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]