ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Cau

Subject:	Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic.
From:	"C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 16 May 2021 22:25:23 +0800

Subject:

Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic.

From:

Date:

Sun, 16 May 2021 22:25:23 +0800



On 21/05/16 21:54, DZDub wrote:

On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 9:00 PM C.H.Ling <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I tried DeNoise AI two years ago, wasn't very happy with the result
since it removed some fine details together with the noise (with digital
image), don't know if the updated version will do better.

For film images I used to use Neat Image to remove the grain. On the
other hand RawTherapee also do a fine job in noise removal.

I agree with you Sharpen AI does not work very well with film images.
But it do ok sometimes:

http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/2000-01X-22T.jpg

http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/2000-01X-22T-SAI-motion-noisy-77-32.jpg


Sorry, here is the right one:

http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/2000-01X-22T-SAI-motion-77-32.jpg

C.H.Ling
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., Mike Gordon via olympus Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., Mike Gordon via olympus Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., Piers Hemy Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., DZDub Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., DZDub Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., C.H.Ling <= Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) Now Topaz AI, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., Moose Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., C.H.Ling [OM] Alternative(s) to D-G nifty fifties [was Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic.], Moose

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., DZDub
Next by Date:	[OM] IMG: Tiny Bloom with Berry, Jim Nichols
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., DZDub
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) Now Topaz AI, C.H.Ling
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Previous by Date:

Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., DZDub

Next by Date:

[OM] IMG: Tiny Bloom with Berry, Jim Nichols

Previous by Thread:

Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) sharper stopped down than 50 1.2? --Caution, on topic., DZDub

Next by Thread:

Re: [OM] Is OMZ 50 1.4 (high sn) Now Topaz AI, C.H.Ling

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]