I was sorting files these days - and haven’t finished that, far from it - and
hit upon some lives past E400 shots. There’s something I liked about it, and
you’re right, that I can’t find in more recent whatever the brand, issues.
Maybe I’m turning melancholy. Who knows :-)
Amities
Philippe
> Le 30 mars 2020 à 21:46, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
>> Nice view Ken, and rendition as well.
>> Happy to see the E-400 amulet worked like a charm
>
> Thank you.
>
> I do believe that Moose must have upgraded the firmware to include the
> "Moosification" plug-ins. The E-300 and E-400 produce better images
> than they really should. This picture is a case-in-point. Ancient 4/3
> CCD sensors with only half a stop of DR shouldn't be this good. As we
> all know, it takes a full-frame CMOS sensor with no less than 40MP and
> monster glass to make usable images. I'll struggle along for now.
>
> Interesting thing about lenses on the E-400. The 14-42 is better at
> 14mm than the 14-54, and almost as good at the rest of the ranges. It
> feels much better on the E-400 too. But the mirror/shutter shock is
> insane with the 14-42. It is mostly neutralized by the mass of the
> 14-54. On the E-300, the shock is neutralized by the body and the
> swinging mirror. On the E-1 there is no shock with either lens. The
> E-3 is closer to the E-300 than the E-1.
>
> AG Schnozz
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|