I'm of the opinion that most online reviewers are ill equipped to make reviews.
I think most of the are in love with their own image and voice and are like
little kidss showing off. Like Tony N. So, I just don't accept something from
folks that are just out for the money. Generally I trust Mike Johnston, Thom
Hogan, and most of the folks on this list. I will occasionally check out Ken
Rockwell, but take him with several grains of salt. One day he thinks Nikon's
the best, then the next day it's Canon, and the day after that, it's Fuji. Onne
most of the vidor reviews areso lacking in production quality that I can't sit
through them.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2019 8:10:06 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] New lens in the harem
On 10/4/2019 9:58 PM, Bill Pearce wrote:
> I remember there was something to improve the AF,
I read endless posts, reviews and opinions. I cam the the personal conclusion
that any improvement was in the minds of
hopefuls. YMMV
> which ain't bad in the number one.
No, it isn't, for my photography. It's the "street shooters" looking to catch
fleeting expressions as they stick their
cameras in peoples faces who complained most. I may be biased on this subject.
;-)
I do have a Konica Hexanon AR 40/1.8 for my A7, but have as yet hardly used it.
Keeping My Distance Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|