On 10/4/2019 2:51 PM, Bill Pearce wrote:
I know this will sound silly. I understand that/
I have never liked shooting a fifty, or for that matter a 35. Bleh! however, I
once owned a contax G system. Great cameras, best 35mm lenses I'v ever used,
outperforming Nikon, Olympus and Leica, but world class bad AF. Makes molasses
look fast. But what it did have was a 40mm. Somehow that lens spoke to me. I
was thrilled using it. And now , I've got a m4/3 panny 20/1.7. It's a nice
lens, and I'm happy with the older MK 1 version.
I don't believe there is any difference but external color. The original came in one color fits all gray. The Mk II
comes in black or silver, to match the bodies.
I did a fair amount of looking a while ago, and could find no indication of any other change. Quite a lot of folks liked
the lens, but wanted faster AF, so there was some noise when the MK II came out.
Slow Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|