I remember there was something to improve the AF, which ain't bad in the number
one.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, October 4, 2019 4:24:30 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] New lens in the harem
On 10/4/2019 2:51 PM, Bill Pearce wrote:
> I know this will sound silly. I understand that/
>
>
> I have never liked shooting a fifty, or for that matter a 35. Bleh! however,
> I once owned a contax G system. Great cameras, best 35mm lenses I'v ever
> used, outperforming Nikon, Olympus and Leica, but world class bad AF. Makes
> molasses look fast. But what it did have was a 40mm. Somehow that lens spoke
> to me. I was thrilled using it. And now , I've got a m4/3 panny 20/1.7. It's
> a nice lens, and I'm happy with the older MK 1 version.
I don't believe there is any difference but external color. The original came
in one color fits all gray. The Mk II
comes in black or silver, to match the bodies.
I did a fair amount of looking a while ago, and could find no indication of any
other change. Quite a lot of folks liked
the lens, but wanted faster AF, so there was some noise when the MK II came
out.
Slow Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|