Subject: | Re: [OM] UV or not UV, that is the question |
---|---|
From: | Mike Gordon via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 13 Jul 2017 19:51:24 -0400 |
Cc: | usher99@xxxxxxx |
Appreciate the filtered and unfiltered opinions as well as the skillful Moose roll-over. I am not overly concerned about perfect WB as shooting raw but it may be more of an issue with film. Plan to bring at least a bit of the delayed digital capture stuff. Moose's analysis shows that the change in WB was quite subtle at altitude with at sensor and lenses. With some Panny lenses on Oly a bit more digging shows that a UV filter will attenuate the purple fringe at high contrast edges especially in OOF elements. One might presume the purple blobbies in specular highlights and the fringing might be worse at altitude, but that is conjecture. Perhaps it is good to worry just a tad about this. Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] More Ferris Wheel Photos, Christopher Crawford |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 26: back to Alicante, Mike Gordon via olympus |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] UV or not UV, that is the question, Chris Trask |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] UV or not UV, that is the question, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |