Thanks, Philippe. Each camera exposed them as I wanted, really. The lights
would have been blown out otherwise. Anyway, it wasn’t about the exposure or
the composition, it was about the lack of noise at ISO6400.
I don’t use no steenkin’ LightRoom, chum :-)
Chris
> On 20 Dec 16, at 21:08, Philippe <photo.philippe.amard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> These looks seriously underexposed - no details in the shadows as seen from
> here.
> And I blame it on the jpegs, to the photog, nor the camera Ias I know it.
>
> I'm absolutely sure the raf/raw contain way much more information than
> provided here - even more than on film...
> So unless you like the black as they are, do return to the lightroom and
> process the raws dear friend :-)
>
> Am I sounding hash?
> I'm simply feeling frustrating as I'm feeling on a diet having to shoot
> lousy/rigid jpeg with the X-T2 when I should have long upgraded my OS and LR
> to enjoy a new and hopefully better life
>
> In a rush, and with no harm whatsoever intended after a 1,000 km drive today …
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|