Hi Chris,
These looks seriously underexposed - no details in the shadows as seen from
here.
And I blame it on the jpegs, to the photog, nor the camera Ias I know it.
I'm absolutely sure the raf/raw contain way much more information than provided
here - even more than on film...
So unless you like the black as they are, do return to the lightroom and
process the raws dear friend :-)
Am I sounding hash?
I'm simply feeling frustrating as I'm feeling on a diet having to shoot
lousy/rigid jpeg with the X-T2 when I should have long upgraded my OS and LR to
enjoy a new and hopefully better life
In a rush, and with no harm whatsoever intended after a 1,000 km drive today …
Amities
Philippe, still shooting raf on X-T1 ...
Le 20 déc. 2016 à 18:41, ChrisB <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> I’m as afflicted with GAS as the next man, and I really fancy a new Fuji
> X-Pro2 or X-T2, but I’ve decided that I don’t need to splash out. I went out
> last night and tonight and took just a few shots with my X-T1 and X-Pro1.
> The focus speed was good enough, even at night (I had my 35/1.4 on the
> X-Pro1, the 18-135 on my X-T1); the viewfinders worked beautifully in those
> conditions, and the resulting noise at ISO6400 was for me negligible:
>
> http://www.images.threeshoes.biz/High-ISO/
> <http://www.images.threeshoes.biz/High-ISO/>
>
> These are jpg untouched from the camera. I can’t upload Raw files to
> SmugMug, but there is little difference.
>
> So, it looks like I’m stuck with what I have :-)
>
> Chris
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|