On 12/20/2016 1:08 PM, Philippe wrote:
Hi Chris,
These looks seriously underexposed - no details in the shadows as seen from
here.
And I blame it on the jpegs, to the photog, nor the camera Ias I know it.
I'm absolutely sure the raf/raw contain way much more information than provided
here - even more than on film...
So unless you like the black as they are, do return to the lightroom and
process the raws dear friend :-)
I don't doubt that there may be more shadow detail in the files. However, I like the presentation. In fact, I would
likely have cropped the second one or darkened the top part to play down the visible, but uninteresting, light colored
upper wall and windows.
Yeah, looking again, I would have cropped everything above the top of the dark part of the wall off. I like the mystery
of seeing only the background where the lights illuminate bits of it.
Accounting for Taste Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|