Subject: | [OM] Fwd: OT: Scottish weather |
---|---|
From: | Michael Gordon via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 18 Oct 2016 22:40:54 -0400 |
Cc: | Michael Gordon <usher99@xxxxxxx> |
Not sure how I got lumped into the renewables could do the whole job crowd. The point was the molten salt solar technique is a possible nice contribution to making a renewable less intermittent. Speaking of molten salt, molten salt reactors designed at MIT are less than 1/2 the cost of our conventional reactors and much safer. Doubt there is much political will to fund them as a partial interim solution however. Molten Mike Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 18:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Since you're quoting IEEE I'll give you this link <http://spectrum.ieee.org/energy/renewables/what-it-would-really-take-to-reverse-climate-change> These Google engineers determined that switching entirely to renewables was simply not doable using any kind of technology that we currently have. Chuck Norcutt On 10/18/2016 6:55 PM, Mike Gordon via olympus wrote: Without perfect synchronous supply those in OZ will be as mad as a cut snake and may reject increasing supply of renewables due to blackouts when the system gets stressed. The Hot Salt solution looks intriguing as one way to mitigate intermittent generation. http://spectrum.ieee.org/green-tech/solar/a-tower-of-molten-salt-will-deliver-solar-power-after-sunset Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OT: Scottish weather, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Adapter on A7, Moose |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OT: Scottish weather, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Fwd: OT: Scottish weather, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |