Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] E-M1 vs E-M5II

Subject: Re: [OM] E-M1 vs E-M5II
From: Frank <wijsmuller@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 20:32:20 +0200
I looked into the Metabones two years ago but several Zuiko's were listed
as not compatible with it. Some of my favourites actually (of course), and
they acknowledged the list might be incomplete (I was reading: you can test
it and we like to hear from you). However, I can't find it anymore, so
maybe the newer design has improved in compatability with OM Zuiko's.

But is there a APS camera with sensor stabilisation? I decided on an A7 and
am very happy with it and my Zuikos (and.. and.. oeps), but I really like
it that I can have a mk2 one day and get IBIS.

I wouldn't buy a Fuji as OM back for that reason alone.



2016-05-19 19:21 GMT+02:00 Piers Hemy <piers@xxxxxxxx>:

> Correct, Chuck.
>
> I do not have any EF mount lenses, but I have OM to EF adapters, and as you
> say, the EF mount is fit for almost any mount adapter.
>
> Piers
> On 19 May 2016 2:35 p.m., "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > So you buy the Canon EOS/EF to whatever adapter to minimize the lens
> > registration distance and then add whatever adapter will adapt a MF lens
> to
> > Canon EF?  Seems to me that would be the only use for the EF version
> since
> > there's no way to control the aperture of an AF Canon EF lens.
> >
> > Chuck Norcutt
> >
> >
> > On 5/16/2016 11:31 AM, piers@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> >> Send me the 85/2, Joel, and it will be my pleasure! That is the one
> Zuiko
> >> I
> >> never got to have, and I sold my 100/2.8 last year (as well as the
> 180/2.8
> >> and 300/4.5, all to the same buyer!)
> >>
> >> I took a look at the specifications, and reckon that a 50/1.4 is a
> >> reasonable stand in, especially if set to minimum focus. So here they
> be:
> >> http://www.hemy.me.uk/Miscellany/P1150343.JPG
> >> http://www.hemy.me.uk/Miscellany/P1150344.JPG
> >> http://www.hemy.me.uk/Miscellany/P1150345.JPG
> >>
> >> You will notice that I did not invest in the real thing, a Metabones
> >> adapter for the simple reason that they were not available for EOS to
> FX,
> >> and I specifically wanted to go that route to maximise the options
> >> available to me (not that I have ever had a single C@non lens). So the
> >> Zhongyi it had to be, despite it being very nearly half the price of the
> >> Metabones EOS to OM.
> >>
> >> Piers
> >>
> >> PS I have already taken a guess at the follow up question, and refer you
> >> to
> >> my " anthropogenesis" response to Chuck the other day.
> >>
> > --
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> >
> >
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz