So you buy the Canon EOS/EF to whatever adapter to minimize the lens
registration distance and then add whatever adapter will adapt a MF lens
to Canon EF? Seems to me that would be the only use for the EF version
since there's no way to control the aperture of an AF Canon EF lens.
Chuck Norcutt
On 5/16/2016 11:31 AM, piers@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Send me the 85/2, Joel, and it will be my pleasure! That is the one Zuiko I
never got to have, and I sold my 100/2.8 last year (as well as the 180/2.8
and 300/4.5, all to the same buyer!)
I took a look at the specifications, and reckon that a 50/1.4 is a
reasonable stand in, especially if set to minimum focus. So here they be:
http://www.hemy.me.uk/Miscellany/P1150343.JPG
http://www.hemy.me.uk/Miscellany/P1150344.JPG
http://www.hemy.me.uk/Miscellany/P1150345.JPG
You will notice that I did not invest in the real thing, a Metabones
adapter for the simple reason that they were not available for EOS to FX,
and I specifically wanted to go that route to maximise the options
available to me (not that I have ever had a single C@non lens). So the
Zhongyi it had to be, despite it being very nearly half the price of the
Metabones EOS to OM.
Piers
PS I have already taken a guess at the follow up question, and refer you to
my " anthropogenesis" response to Chuck the other day.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
.
|
