> Alas, I would send it, Piers, of course I would, you know I would, but
> you'd probably have to have the SC silvernose version which Gary tested as
> focusing sharper at f2 and 2.8 than the crummy MC/black version I have.
Well, the 85/2 is a strange beast because half of us here on the OM
list prefer the older versions and half prefer the newer versions. Me?
I've had neither.
>> I took a look at the specifications, and reckon that a 50/1.4 is a
>> reasonable stand in, especially if set to minimum focus. So here they be:
>> http://www.hemy.me.uk/Miscellany/P1150343.JPG
>> http://www.hemy.me.uk/Miscellany/P1150344.JPG
>> http://www.hemy.me.uk/Miscellany/P1150345.JPG
>
> Yes, that's close enough for jazz. It looks rather schnozzy but quite
> nice. I am intrigued.
Yeah, that looks pretty nice. Alas, I'm more interested in a Sony
A7___, but the Fuji with reducer is meowing my cat.
AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
