Subject: | Re: [OM] Re-photography vs. scanning of slides, was: Legacy lens for copy work |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 27 Dec 2015 06:15:53 -0500 |
Thanks for the feedback. Now I know I don't have to wait for the E-M1
Mk II. Neither do I have any reason for further procrastination. :-)
Chuck Norcutt On 12/27/2015 2:25 AM, Moose wrote: On 12/25/2015 6:17 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:Thanks for the comments. I think I'll try the 50/3.5 on the E-M1.I just tried shooting a slide with 50/3.5 and the High Res Mode of the E-M5 II. 6500 dpi is definitely overkill for this old slide. It does nicely show grain clump detail. :-) It takes about 15 sec. for the camera to take 8 1/20 sec shots, process and write out JPEG and Raw files. As I recall, Oly was saying they expect to cut this to 1/60 sec. in the future. Try Anything Moose -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Another shot at Peng Chau, Hong Kong, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Another shot at Peng Chau, Hong Kong, Michael Wong |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re-photography vs. scanning of slides, was: Legacy lens for copy work, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re-photography vs. scanning of slides, was: Legacy lens for copy work, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |