Subject: | Re: [OM] Another shot at Peng Chau, Hong Kong |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 27 Dec 2015 06:11:27 -0500 |
Photographic unsharp masking? <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsharp_masking#Photographic_unsharp_masking>In short: A blurred positive made from the negative is sandwiched with the negative in the enlarger. Chuck Norcutt On 12/27/2015 2:20 AM, Moose wrote: On 12/26/2015 9:42 AM, Michael Wong wrote:Originally no chair nearby the window, I thought the composition was too simple without an interest point. Moreover, I thought the "colour" will be too greyish if without the chair. Hence, I moved the chair "into" the picture and I waited the cloud covering sunny to keep more details on the chair before shooting.I like the subject(s) and composition quite a lot. It's the kind of thing I could see on a gallery wall, or even mine. OTOH, overall, it seems mostly too flat for my taste, but with the chair highlight detail invisible. <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/MWong/Chair.htm> Now that's something I definitely could see on my wall. How one might do something like this in the wet darkroom, I have don't really know. Snappier Moose -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Re-photography vs. scanning of slides, was: Legacy lens for copy work, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Re-photography vs. scanning of slides, was: Legacy lens for copy work, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Another shot at Peng Chau, Hong Kong, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Another shot at Peng Chau, Hong Kong, Michael Wong |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |