----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Yes, I certainly love my 90/2 even for magnification greater than 1:4.
This is probably shot at 1:3 with 5D II:
www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_5157.JPG
One, unanswerable question - is it any better than it would have been with
one of the other excellent MF macros from that time?
And a comment. I tried to be specific about macro qualities in lenses in
these posts. This, very nice, image is about central sharpness; sharpness
away from the center, field curvature, and so on don't mean a thing for
this subject and DoF.
I'm happy that you are enjoying yours.
Stubbornly Macro Moose
Ok, here is a better (still not perfect, I know) sample I just took:
http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_3658.JPG
Original slide - Fuji RD100, OM 35-105. Shot with 5D II and 90/2 at 1:2
(F4).
I would say the resolution is comparable to my OM80/4 1:1 macro.
It may take a better test to verify its edge to edge macro performance. But
for distance objects, while my 100/2 is slightly sharper at the center, the
90/2 beat it at the edges, it gives a very even edge to edge performance.
C.H.Ling
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
