----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Norton" <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Then again, I found the 90/2 to be lowly. If it didn't claim to be a
Macro
lens, I'd have no complaint, but past about 1:4, it went all mushy.
Likely
the only OM lens I bought, tried out, and sold on fairly promptly (which
is
why it wasn't in the above test.)
I've always wondered about sample variability. While you aren't the
only person to have found issues with the 90/2, it certainly is not an
universal opinion.
Yes, I certainly love my 90/2 even for magnification greater than 1:4.
This is probably shot at 1:3 with 5D II:
www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_5157.JPG
C.H.Ling
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|