Not sure why I haven't thought of it. The OMZ 50/1.4 should make a good
portrait lens on m.4/3. I'm not sure I've ever even mounted it on the
camera... as well as many other OMZ lenses.
Chuck Norcutt
On 4/9/2015 5:40 AM, Frank wrote:
My empty wallet will be a bigger (thinner) problem *after* the 50mm f/1
then DOF with my 45mm 1.8* before* it...
2015-04-09 3:50 GMT+02:00 Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
The 50mm f/1 should solve the portrait depth of field problem for m.4/3
Chuck Norcutt
On 4/8/2015 6:16 PM, Sandy Harris wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Chris Trask <christrask@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
http://www.dailycameranews.com/2015/03/olympus-12mm-f1-
25mm-f1-and-50mm-f1-lenses-rumored-for-2016/
Yes, very interesting. I don't know as I have ever seen an f/1
lens.
Voigtlander have three F 0.95 manual focus lenses for m4/3: 17.5, 25 and
42.5 mm
https://www.cameraquest.com/voigt_m43_17.htm
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|