Now stop, Chris, you're tormenting them.
Charlie
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Chris Trask <christrask@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> >
> >An ORF is a data dump. To even view it some form of interpretation must
> >be made to inform our visual sense. The argument about seeing raw,
> >unadulterated data is meaningless. If it ain't 1's and 0's it's
> >processed. Go ahead and compare the ORF to a TIF and see which works for
> >you Chris. That's what counts.
> >
>
> Did that yesterday, and they came out looking the same, closer to the
> illustrations in the book than did the JPEG photos I took last year. All I
> can say for now is that it's too bad Olympus removed the TIFF raw option
> from the E-510 and E-520.
>
>
> Chris
>
> When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
> - Hunter S. Thompson
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|