>
>An ORF is a data dump. To even view it some form of interpretation must
>be made to inform our visual sense. The argument about seeing raw,
>unadulterated data is meaningless. If it ain't 1's and 0's it's
>processed. Go ahead and compare the ORF to a TIF and see which works for
>you Chris. That's what counts.
>
Did that yesterday, and they came out looking the same, closer to the
illustrations in the book than did the JPEG photos I took last year. All I can
say for now is that it's too bad Olympus removed the TIFF raw option from the
E-510 and E-520.
Chris
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
- Hunter S. Thompson
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|