On 1/18/2015 1:09 PM, philippe.amard wrote:
Le 18 janv. 15 à 21:08, Moose a écrit :
On 1/17/2015 9:38 AM, Philippe wrote:
1600 for I wanted RAW, and it is the ISO limit of both bodies in RAW I think)
What? That can't be right.
I don't know the details but above a certain value, the ISOs are obtained digitally v analog - is it you who had an
L1? JPEGs and RAWs don't have the same ISO highest values either. Newer sensors use tricks ;-)
Yesbut - OK, I checked; Raw goes up to ISO 6400, which is as high as I've ever
used, or maybe higher.
The D700 is 5.5 years older than the X-T1,
Perhaps a little less as the sensor was already in the XE-2
Oh, getting picky, eh? More checking - and the D700 sensor system is from the year older D3, to the gap holds or widens.
:-)
So you are not just comparing FF to APS-C, but old vs. new tech. (I also have an old, 12 MP FF camera, Canon 5D, but
the new stuff whups it on detail.)
Agreed, but the debate was between a D700 user (not me) and XT-1 (some former)
owners.
Well, I was not to know that; no such details in your post here.
I'm not sure why more people don't use the wonderful comparison facilities in
the dpreview tests.
/ Snip/
So I downloaded the Raw files, ran 'em through ACR*, stacked 'em and did some processing and comparing.
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/X-T1_E-M1_D700/FON.htm>
Nice job :-)
Thanks!
They don't seem to say any more, but they used to use the best prime lenses available for each camera, stopped down
short of diffraction. On a flat target, that should nail it.
Yup, I shot at 1.4 because one of the points that was debated was the DoF -
Dpreview doesn't here.
Ah well, I didn't know that, either. Explains the test shot.
I know this started out as FF vs. APS-C, but that ship has, for now, sailed. The D750 resolves a great deal more fine
detail than the smaller sensor cameras - no contest.
At 3 x the price tag for a difference that doesn't strike the viewer on screen most of the time - of course if we
start cropping ... ;-)
/ snip/
Thanks for the post. I've been wondering about all the Fuji X love here, what with the larger sensor, but it appears
I needn't, other than ergonomics and camera esthetics.
Sure. However, I didn't buy the XE-1, nor the X-T1; Alice thought I needed lighter gear and proceeded ... but I'm
enjoying experimenting with them a lot
And were it not for the weight and bulk, I'd still be carrying the D700 or one
of its successors ...
And I might still be shooting FF, but I agree with Alice, for me, if not for
you. :-)
Thank you in any case for your informed review and enlightening opinion.
My pleasure, and I learned things. ;-)
Comparatively Informed Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|