I certainly do much less post-processing than Moose, but I do some. And I want
to have the flexibility to do a lot if a particular image needs it.
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator
YNWA
On 02 Dec 2014, at 10:47, ChrisB <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Well, since Nathan does little or no post-processing, perhaps JPGs from a
> good source would be more suitable than he (or you) have hitherto considered.
>
> I must admit that I occasionally click the “Enhance” button in Aperture even
> with JPGs, but more often will revert to the Raw file that I’ve taken at the
> same time.
>
> “Medium Rare”? Is that a Tasty Moose? :-)
>
> Chris
>
>> On 2 Dec 14, at 09:25, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/2/2014 1:13 AM, ChrisB wrote:
>>> I know that you wrote, Nathan, that you didn’t want to use JPGs, but they
>>> really are very good. I take Raw+JPG, using the former only very rarely.
>>
>> Depends on what one wants to do. I never use the JPEGs - and I've tried them.
>>
>> Medium Rare Moose
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|