Oh my sainted aunt!
And thanks, Piers. :-)
Chris
> On 14 Nov 14, at 00:29, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It's because he "didn't" want to answer the question. "Did" or "didn't" say
> that whatever the deed was it has already been done or not done. His failure
> to answer the question is a past event. :-)
>
> Chuck Norcutt (native language mangler)
>
>
> On 11/13/2014 4:21 PM, philippe.amard wrote:
>> That was a real question from a non native photographer ;-)
>>
>> Amities
>> Philippe
>>
>> Le 13 nov. 14 à 22:13, ChrisB a écrit :
>>
>>> “Did”?
>>>
>>> It’s probably time to move back to photography, Phlippe. I haven’t
>>> seen any of your work for a while.
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>> On 13 Nov 2014, at 19:40, philippe.amard <philippe.amard@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hasn't McLuhan said the mangle is the message?
>>>>
>>>> Why 'did' BTW?
>>>>
>>>> Philippe
>>>
>>> --
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>> One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible to
>> the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
>> NO ARCHIVE
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|