Subject: | Re: [OM] Windows users - y'all had better read this - Chris and Chuck |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:29:31 -0500 |
It's because he "didn't" want to answer the question. "Did" or "didn't"
say that whatever the deed was it has already been done or not done.
His failure to answer the question is a past event. :-)
Chuck Norcutt (native language mangler) On 11/13/2014 4:21 PM, philippe.amard wrote: That was a real question from a non native photographer ;-) Amities Philippe Le 13 nov. 14 à 22:13, ChrisB a écrit :“Did”? It’s probably time to move back to photography, Phlippe. I haven’t seen any of your work for a while. ChrisOn 13 Nov 2014, at 19:40, philippe.amard <philippe.amard@xxxxxx> wrote: Hasn't McLuhan said the mangle is the message? Why 'did' BTW? Philippe-- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince. NO ARCHIVE -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Windows users - y'all had better read this, Mike Gordon via olympus |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Windows users - y'all had better read this, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Windows users - y'all had better read this - Piers, ChrisB |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Windows users - y'all had better read this - Chris and Chuck, ChrisB |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |