Sir Moose...
Are you sure you've never been in politics? ;o)
On Oct 21, 2014 1:56 PM, "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/21/2014 11:07 AM, SwissPace wrote:
>
>> sorry and hopefully not being pushy and I don't think I missed any
>> replies, I posted this email yesterday and apologised for forgetting to
>> change the thread. However the advice I was hoping for, is how, if its
>> really dark, do I expose the photo to not get a blown out moon, or is
>> cheating the only way? I thought of maybe a graduated filter but that would
>> remove any stars as well.
>>
>
> You can't get both moon, at least any but a sliver, and dark landscape
> both properly exposed with any sensor any of us has.
>
> The way to avoid cheating is to redefine it as I did in a recent post. Two
> matching shots with different exposures is not cheating; it's focus
> management. Moving an element to a different place or a different image may
> be cheating. :-)
>
> Definitional Management Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|