There's no focus stacking required for this shot if you use hyperfocal
methods. At 35mm and f/3.4 and 1/90 sec. (original exposure) focusing
at 40 feet will give you focus from 20 feet to infinity. If that's not
quite enough then closing down to f/5 and cutting the shutter speed to
1/45 and focus at 27 feet will give you 13.5 feet to infinity. If
that's not enough put it on a tripod and go smaller and slower. f/11
and 1/10 second and focus at 13 feet will give you 6.5 feet to infinity.
Since you're using a prime no calculations should be required because
the hyperfocal marks should be on your lens.
Dr. Focus
On 10/18/2014 8:24 PM, Tmanley wrote:
Focus stacking is something I'm going to have to learn!!
Thanks,
Tina
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 18, 2014, at 8:13 PM, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/18/2014 3:09 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
PESO:
I guess the 35/2.0 is not the best lens to use to photograph the moon!!
http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/157871847/large
Sure it is. Just take two, one as focused, another focused on the moon. If
using a tripod, you can just drop the top of the second on on the first and
graduate the seam. Handheld, it will require a little adjustment of position in
PS.
It's just focus stacking. ;-)
Lunar Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|