Cost savings, fun and funky factor of using OM1 OM3 daily hockey puck built
cameras vs delicate DSLRs basics cost effectiveness
On Sep 8, 2014, at 1:51 PM, Sawyer, Edward wrote:
> Aside from novelty, what would the point be? The best part of the OM
> system is/was the lenses, those are easily usable full-frame on Sony,
> Nikon, canon bodies, etc.
>
> One you hack some kludgy aps-c sensor/back monstrosity onto it, any OM
> body loses whatever form factor that *might* have made it worth
> considering. (small size/ light weight). Not only that but you get the
> crappiness of a crop factor result. Not that any of the OM bodies are
> really that special to begin with anyway, even when shooting film.
> (aesthetics aside - talking function here.)
>
>
>
> On 9/8/14 6:16 AM, "olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> <olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Re: [OM] The Impossible OM Project
>> Message-ID:
>> <CABtFEARnOyLAyYCDRYT6ntZgbZebMUPoXPeTCzRcv_hTGATOYw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>
>> Agreed that OTF would be an issue for longer-exposure pictures as well
>> as OTF flash-control. However, for most exposures shorter than 1/60
>> second, OTF gets the majority of the exposure off of the first
>> curtain.
>>
>> I'm very serious about this.
>>
>> Ken
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|