Aside from novelty, what would the point be? The best part of the OM
system is/was the lenses, those are easily usable full-frame on Sony,
Nikon, canon bodies, etc.
One you hack some kludgy aps-c sensor/back monstrosity onto it, any OM
body loses whatever form factor that *might* have made it worth
considering. (small size/ light weight). Not only that but you get the
crappiness of a crop factor result. Not that any of the OM bodies are
really that special to begin with anyway, even when shooting film.
(aesthetics aside - talking function here.)
On 9/8/14 6:16 AM, "olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Re: [OM] The Impossible OM Project
>Message-ID:
> <CABtFEARnOyLAyYCDRYT6ntZgbZebMUPoXPeTCzRcv_hTGATOYw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
>Agreed that OTF would be an issue for longer-exposure pictures as well
>as OTF flash-control. However, for most exposures shorter than 1/60
>second, OTF gets the majority of the exposure off of the first
>curtain.
>
>I'm very serious about this.
>
>Ken
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|