Aside from zoom creep (which JH says is adjustable with a screw under
the focusing rubber) mine is in perfect condition. It's apparently one
of very few. I have no idea why mine is good and many others are bad.
Chuck Norcutt
On 8/25/2014 10:37 AM, Paul Braun wrote:
Lucky you. You still have one that's not clouded?
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Chuck Norcutt <
chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Looks like I may have to try the 65-200 on the E-M5.
Chuck Norcutt
On 8/25/2014 1:06 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
Thanks for looking, Mike. Here are some 65-200 F4 FF un-cropped images.
http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=14245
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Gordon via olympus"
<olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 8:28 AM
Subject: [OM] Insects
Nice, CH. Thanks for posting. Long time since we've seen images using
the OM 65-200. The bokeh is nice. Wonder if it is actually better
on MFT
than natively like the 200/4.
Mike --
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|