Haven't check the OM history, I believe the sequency could be 85-250, 65-200
and then 50-250.
50-250 is a rather sharp lens but bokeh is not always nice. My experience
with 50-250 was ok in stability (on 5D II), I was happy with some stage
shots taken by it.
For long lens handheld, I got sharper images when the other hand was holding
the front part of the lens.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Gordon via olympus" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CH writes:
Here are some 65-200 F4 FF un-cropped images.
http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=14245
Thanks again--works well on FF too. I no longer recall if the 65-200/4 was
the latest tele zoom. I could use a refresher course on the salient
distinguishing factors of the 50-250/5, which I have, the 65-200 and
85-250. I recall the 50-250 was one of Maitani's favorite travel
lenses--no tripod mount though --and very sensitive to vibration given how
long and light--it is under rated, IMO when duly stabilized.
Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|