Lucky you. You still have one that's not clouded?
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Chuck Norcutt <
chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Looks like I may have to try the 65-200 on the E-M5.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
>
> On 8/25/2014 1:06 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>
>> Thanks for looking, Mike. Here are some 65-200 F4 FF un-cropped images.
>>
>> http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=14245
>>
>> C.H.Ling
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Gordon via olympus"
>> <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 8:28 AM
>> Subject: [OM] Insects
>>
>>
>> Nice, CH. Thanks for posting. Long time since we've seen images using
>>> the OM 65-200. The bokeh is nice. Wonder if it is actually better
>>> on MFT
>>> than natively like the 200/4.
>>>
>>> Mike --
>>>
>>
>> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
Paul Braun
Certified Music Junkie
"Music washes from the soul the dust of everyday life." -- Berthold Auerbach
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|