>
>Le 13 juin 2014 à 23:51, Chris Trask <christrask@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
>> Could it be that RAW and HQ with no compression are to be used if the
>> filters are to function?
>
>Do you mean to say that RAW and HQ are related? I think not.
>The size of the raw file doesn't vary whatever SQ HQ LQ you use, does it?
>
Yes, as it should. I have mine set to SQ with 1/8 compression, which
results in 1.7M or so files.
>
>My tip of the day - just forget about these in camera filters and convert from
>the raw, this is where
>the information is, without a loss, and leaves much more room for you to
>adjust your BW to taste ;-)
>
Ultimately I will, but the emulated filters are convenient if I should
learn how to use them. I don't want to be carrying multiple filter wallets,
just the one with some cooling and warming filters plus a +1 diopter closeup
and some adapter rings.
Chris
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
- Hunter S. Thompson
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|