Subject: | Re: [OM] No flash? |
---|---|
From: | DZDub <jdubikins@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 20 Feb 2014 07:59:07 -0600 |
I can only agree with Philippe (although I like the non-flash ones best). Joel W. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:06 PM, C.H.Ling <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks for the praise, Philippe! > > C.H.Ling > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "philippe.amard" <philippe.amard@xxxxxx> > To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:52 AM > Subject: Re: [OM] No flash? > > > All wonderful! > > Thanks > > Philippe > > Le 19 févr. 14 à 17:15, C.H.Ling a écrit : > > > > > http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/pict/Insect/photo9.htm > > > > With digital (high ISO) or open shade it may be ok without flash. > > > > http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/pict/Insect/m01.html > > > > http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/pict/Insect/m03.html > > > > http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/pict/Insect/m07.html > > > > C.H.Ling > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] FL-600R, DZDub |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: More from the avant-garde music fest, DZDub |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] No flash?, C.H.Ling |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] No flash?, Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |