Subject: | Re: [OM] No flash? |
---|---|
From: | "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 20 Feb 2014 00:56:40 +0800 |
Thanks, Chuck. C.H.Ling ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Lovely as always... with or without flash. > > Chuck Norcutt > > > On 2/19/2014 11:15 AM, C.H.Ling wrote: >> It was just you choose not to, does not mean you don't have to. As far as >> I >> remember you show us some indoor images from Guatemala suffered from >> extreme >> contrast with the subject too dark to rescue. IMHO many of them could do >> better with fill or bounce flash (even off the wood). >> >> With film at high magnification most likely you will need flash. And many >> of >> the insects are hide under leaves and trees. >> >> http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/pict/Insect/photo9.htm >> >> With digital (high ISO) or open shade it may be ok without flash. >> >> http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/pict/Insect/m01.html >> >> http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/pict/Insect/m03.html >> >> http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/pict/Insect/m07.html >> >> C.H.Ling >> -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] No flash?, C.H.Ling |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] FL-600R, Paul Braun |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] No flash?, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] No flash?, Tina Manley |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |