Subject: | Re: [OM] No flash? |
---|---|
From: | Chris Trask <christrask@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 19 Feb 2014 08:15:49 -0700 (GMT-07:00) |
> >Tina posted: "Just say NO to flash." >And Moose responded: ""Nothing that requires flash is photogenic. :-)" >And Dean says, "Well, maybe so, but try to take these without flash:" > >< >http://s124.photobucket.com/user/Dean_Hansen/library/Aquaticinsects?sort=3&page=1 >> ><http://members.iphouse.com/hanse112/page2/page2.html> > Same with wildflowers, where occasional conflicts with shadow due to inconvenient sun angle requires a flash to soften the contrast. A reflector works well provided you have a third hand or a tripod available. Chris When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro - Hunter S. Thompson -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 7: Alicante countryside, Chris Trask |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] No flash?, Tina Manley |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] No flash?, Bill Pearce |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] No flash?, Tina Manley |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |