First x10 zoom lens I know was produced by Angenieux, for the Moscow
olympics? ...
http://www.angenieux.com/zoom-lenses/history/
I think the US didn't like Angenieux's at the time except when heading
for the moon ;-) ;-)
Amities
Ph
Le 16 févr. 14 à 22:45, Andrew Fildes a écrit :
> If you're shifting to short standard - the best I've ever used was
> the Zeiss 24-70mm for the Sony Alpha. Flawless but heavy, and $3K.
> But 14-150mm is a stretch and it should only stand up to comparison
> with like lenses.
>
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> www.soultheft.com
>
> Author/Publisher:
> The SLR Compendium:
> revised edition -
> http://blur.by/19Hb8or
> The TLR Compendium
> http://blur.by/1eDpqN7
>
>
>
> On 17/02/2014, at 2:43 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>
>> My frame of reference are the fixed focal length Leica (and lately
>> also Fuji X) lenses. So far I have only seen one zoom that could
>> compare to those in terms of optical quality, and that was the
>> 35-70mm Leica R lens I had years ago. The Fuji X 18-55mm is good
>> too, but note that the ratio on this one is rather modest as well.
>> There is no free lunch.
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|